🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in graves at risk from coastal erosion state that indecision on how best to address the issue is creating unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Graveyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation details a series of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer locations. Officials maintain it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Along the shoreline lies the grave of a former paratrooper who died while working abroad. His parent said she lost sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to consider this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some want additional coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to proceed for now. Different voices argue the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was time to consider all the choices. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. It requires good community discussions to find the right answers for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in life after death, providing a spiritual perspective on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.